Ghostbear
Space Cadet
- Dabei seit
- 02.11.2004
- Beiträge
- 1.031
- Zustimmungen
- 794
Hallo Leute,
ich hab auf der http://www.enginehistory.org/ Seite zwei sehr schön gemachte .pdf Dokumente aufgetan, die ich Euch nicht vorenthalten will:
http://www.enginehistory.org/German/Me-262/Me262_Airframe_2.pdf (~7MB)
http://www.enginehistory.org/German/Me-262/Me262_Engine_2.pdf (~5MB)
Es handelt sich um Design Analysen, die von den Amerikanern über die Me 262 erstellt wurden.
Hier ist der dazugehörige Text:
ich hab auf der http://www.enginehistory.org/ Seite zwei sehr schön gemachte .pdf Dokumente aufgetan, die ich Euch nicht vorenthalten will:
http://www.enginehistory.org/German/Me-262/Me262_Airframe_2.pdf (~7MB)
http://www.enginehistory.org/German/Me-262/Me262_Engine_2.pdf (~5MB)
Es handelt sich um Design Analysen, die von den Amerikanern über die Me 262 erstellt wurden.
Hier ist der dazugehörige Text:
http://www.enginehistory.org/ schrieb:Compilation Copyright, J.L. McClellan, 2004
The AEHS is indebted to Mr. J.L. McClellan and to the McGraw-Hill Publishing Company for their generosity in allowing the publication of these important insights into the Messerschmitt Me-262. These articles were originally published in the October and November, 1945 issues, Volume 44, numbers 10 and 11, of Aviation magazine, published by McGraw- Hill Publishing Company of New York, NY, USA. They were reconstructed from microfilm by J.L. McClellan. The source is University Microfilms International, Publication No. 364 (Aviation Week and Space Technology), Reel No. 21 (January 1945 – December 1945).
The reconstruction process used by Mr. McClellan is highly labor intensive, using much level stretching, followed by hand touch-up of lines and clean up of extraneous marks, gray areas and other image defects.
The microfilm was taken from a tightly bound volume, so that there is some distortion of the images, especially near the binding. It has not been practical to remove or compensate for all the distortions, so none of the illustrations in this reconstruction should be considered reliable sources as to fine details of shape, proportion or spatial relationship. The distortions are, in general, small, and should not detract from a general appreciation of arrangement and relationship. Mr. McClellan has attempted to represent the original layout of the article, but there are some exceptions. Limitations in the compositing tools cause a difference in the text flow relative to the illustrations, compared to the original, so that some changes have been made, to compensate partially for that effect, and the tabular data have been removed from the flow of text and brought together on a single page after the text, partly to make them more accessible, and partly to sidestep problems with page layout. In addition, the original Part II article contained a foldout. Images from that sheet have been added at the end of the article. The images have considerable overlap, so that no information is lost, even though it is not practical to reproduce the original illustrations.